Study habits |
N (%) |
||
During classes |
|||
Class attendance |
|||
All classes |
553 (44%) |
||
Some classes |
621 (49%) |
||
No class |
88 (7%) |
||
Rewriting/organizing notes |
|||
Yes |
753 (60%) |
||
No |
509 (40%) |
||
Supplementary sources |
|||
Yes |
1174 (93%) |
||
No |
88 (7%) |
||
Studying for exams |
|||
Learning strategy |
|||
Spaced practice |
527 (42%) |
||
Cramming |
753 (58%) |
||
Skipping chapters |
|||
Never |
621 (49%) |
||
Yes |
641 (51%) |
||
Memorizing technique |
|||
Using one’s own words |
346 (27%) |
||
Learning by heart |
916 (73%) |
||
Revising mode |
|||
Alone |
1055 (84%) |
||
With a group |
207 (16%) |
||
During exams period |
|||
Revision efficiency |
|||
I revise what I had learnt |
922 (73%) |
||
I discover my lessons |
340 (27%) |
Factors associated with academic performance of medical students
To identify the factors associated with the participants’ academic performance, students identified as medium performers (N = 580) were excluded from the univariate and multivariate analysis. Hence, we only compared two categories; high performers and low performers, representing a total number of 682 students.
As illustrated in Table 2, univariate analysis found a significant association between high performers and class attendance (p<0.001), reorganization of class notes (p=0.001), and using supplementary resources (p=0.005). High performing students were also significantly associated with spaced learning strategy (p<0.001), memorizing in the student's own words (p=0.005), never skipping chapters during revision (p<0.001), working alone (p<0.001), and being highly involved in one’s studies (p<0.001).
Multivariate analysis identified five risk factors for low academic performance, namely non-attendance to classes nce (p=0.001), non-use of supplementary documents (p=0.023), skipping chapter during revisions (p<0.001), resorting to cramming as learning strategy (p=0.001) and low personal involvement in one’s studies (p<0.001) (see Table 2).
Table 2. Factors associated to medical students’ academic performance.
Academic performance |
|||||||
Univariate analysis |
Multivariate analysis |
||||||
Items |
High performers N (%) |
Low performers N (%) |
p-value |
OR |
CI |
p-value |
|
Sex |
- |
- |
- |
||||
Women |
309 (66.9) |
153 (33.1) |
0.402 |
||||
Men |
150 (68.2) |
70 (31.8) |
|||||
Study level |
- |
- |
- |
||||
1st Cycle |
94 (71.2) |
38 (28.8) |
0.120 |
||||
2nd Cycle |
280 (68.5) |
129 (31.5) |
|||||
3nd Cycle |
85 (60.3) |
56 (39.7) |
|||||
Class attendance |
0.001 |
||||||
All classes |
267 (81.7) |
60 (18.3) |
<0.001 |
1 |
|||
Some classes |
80 (50.0) |
80 (50.0) |
2.2 |
[1.1 – 5.9] |
0.021 |
||
No class |
18 (40.0) |
27 (60.0) |
2.6 |
[1.4 – 3.3] |
0.000 |
||
Rewriting/organizing notes |
_- |
- |
- |
||||
Yes |
305 (71.6) |
121 (28.4) |
0.001 |
||||
No |
154 (60.2) |
102 (39.8) |
|||||
Supplementary sources |
0.023 |
||||||
Yes |
436 (68.7) |
199 (31.3) |
0.005 |
1 |
|||
No |
23 (48.9) |
24 (51.1) |
2.5 |
[1.1 – 5.6] |
|||
Learning strategy |
0.001 |
||||||
Spaced practice |
242 (77.8) |
69 (22.2) |
<0.001 |
1 |
|||
Cramming |
217 (58.5) |
154 (41.5) |
2.0 |
[1.3 – 3.1] |
|||
Skipping chapters |
<0.001 |
||||||
Never |
293 (82.3) |
63 (17.7) |
<0.001 |
1 |
|||
Yes |
166 (50.9) |
160 (49.1) |
3.3 |
[2.1 – 5.2] |
|||
Memorizing technique |
- |
- |
- |
||||
Using one’s own words |
314 (64.3) |
174 (35.7) |
0.005 |
||||
Learning by heart |
145 (74.7) |
49 (25.3) |
|||||
Revising mode |
- |
- |
- |
||||
Alone |
400 (70.1) |
171 (29.9) |
<0.001 |
||||
With a group |
59 (53.2) |
52 (46.8) |
|||||
During exams period |
- |
- |
- |
||||
I revise what I had learnt |
371 (74.1) |
130 (25.9) |
<0.001 |
||||
I discover my lessons |
88 (48.6) |
93 (51.4) |
|||||
Personal involvement |
<0.001 |
||||||
High |
164 (95.3) |
8 (4.7) |
<0.001 |
1 |
|||
Acceptable |
273 (66.1) |
140 (33.9) |
6.6 |
[3.0 – 14.3] |
0.000 |
||
Low |
22 (22.7) |
75 (77.3) |
23.2 |
[9.0 – 59.0] |
0.000 |
DISCUSSION
The present study results largely confirmed our initial hypothesis, and highlighted the existence of undeniable and statistically significant links between some study habits of medical students and the academic performance of these students, as reflected by their grades in exams. Indeed,
univariate and multivariate statistical analyses underlined strongly significant association between performance and class attendance, learning strategies, modes and techniques, skipping chapters, and above all the degree of personal involvement in one’s studies.
Our participants were female for two-thirds of the population studied, which reflects the current composition of medical students with a clear female majority that has been increasingly marked over the past fifteen years [12]. They were also well distributed between the 3 different cycles of medical studies and represented the five largest public faculties of medicine in Morocco.
In contrast with previous studies emphasizing that women generally demonstrate higher academic performance than men [13-14], the gender of our participants did not influence their performance. This could be explained by the fact that our evaluation of academic performance was based on student self-assessment. And it is already established that in the field of science, women generally tend to undermine their own level, skill or achievement less [15-16].
Our results also highlighted that not attending classes at all, increased the risk of academic difficulty by 2.6-fold compared to attending all classes. Class attendance is not compulsory in Moroccan medical schools. Hence, young students, who may lack necessary hindsight and judgement skills, are free to decide whether to attend or not, with consequences on their academic performance as shown by our results. That said, evidence from the literature was mixed on the issue of “class attendance” and its impact on the academic performance of medical students, with some studies pointing to a link between class absence and academic failure [17-18] and others not finding this link [19-20].
On the other hand, revision strategy plays a fundamental role in academic results. Different learning strategies have largely demonstrated their effectiveness in boosting memory retention capacity, including “spaced practice” [21-22]. Consequently, it appears necessary to introduce a specific course on learning techniques into the medical studies curriculum in order to better prepare medical students to become effective learners.
Working alone or in a group can have a significant impact on academic performance. Indeed, group work can boost episodic memory, thanks to the convivial context in which revisions take place [23], especially if the individuals in the study group use the elaboration technique (one person explains the lesson to the others), widely recognized for its very favorable effects on memory capacity [24]. In contrast, working alone may be more effective on concentration with fewer distractions caused by group interactions [25]. In our study, working alone was associated with better academic results in the univariate analysis, but this association was no longer significant when the other factors were incriminated (multivariate analysis).
Finally, the intrinsic motivation and the degree of investment of each student in his/her studies represent a major determinant in academic success. Indeed, our results showed that adopting the strategy of " passing exams with the least effort" was associated with a 23-fold increased risk of academic difficulty compared to those who were "very demanding of themselves regarding their studies". Logically, when we invest the most, we succeed the best.
CONCLUSION
Succeeding in medical studies requires the combination of different factors, some of which are directly related to the students themselves, their degree of commitment, their attendance to classes and involvement in revisions, as well as their learning strategies and techniques. However, other factors independent of the students’ efforts are also involved in success or failure, such as teaching and assessment methods, which require permanent reassessment by professors and faculty members in order to achieve the highest success rates for their students, and lighten the burden of devastating failure.
References:
- Huff. K. L.. & Fang. D. (1999). When are students most at risk of encountering academic difficulty? a study of the 1992 matriculants to US medical schools. Academic medicine: journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges. 74(4). 454-460.
- Freeman. B. K.. Landry. A.. Trevino. R.. Grande. D.. & Shea. J. A. (2016). Understanding the leaky pipeline: perceived barriers to pursuing a career in medicine or dentistry among underrepresented-in-medicine undergraduate students. Academic Medicine. 91(7). 987-993.
- Cariaga-Lo. L. D.. Enarson. C. E.. Crandall. S. J.. Zaccaro. D. J.. & Richards. B. F. (1997). Cognitive and noncognitive predictors of academic difficulty and attrition. Academic Medicine. 72(10). S69-S71.
- Heinen. I.. Bullinger. M.. & Kocalevent. R. D. (2017). Perceived stress in first year medical students-associations with personal resources and emotional distress. BMC medical education. 17(1). 1-14.
- Mannan. M. A. (2007). Student attrition and academic and social integration: Application of Tinto’s model at the University of Papua New Guinea. Higher education. 53(2). 147-165.
- Kruzicevic. S. M.. Barisic. K. J.. Banozic. A.. Esteban. C. D.. Sapunar. D.. & Puljak. L. (2012). Predictors of attrition and academic success of medical students: a 30-year retrospective study. PloS one. 7(6). e39144.
- Holland. C. (2016). Critical review: medical students’ motivation after failure. Advances in Health Sciences Education. 21(3). 695-710.
- Paul. G.. Hinman. G.. Dottl. S.. & Passon. J. (2009). Academic development: a survey of academic difficulties experienced by medical students and support services provided. Teaching and learning in medicine. 21(3). 254-260.
- Yates. J.. & James. D. (2007). Risk factors for poor performance on the undergraduate medical course: cohort study at Nottingham University. Medical education. 41(1). 65-73.
- Sohail. N. (2013). Stress and academic performance among medical students. J Coll Physicians Surg Pak. 23(1). 67-71.
- Winston. K. A.. van der Vleuten. C. P.. & Scherpbier. A. J. (2014). Prediction and prevention of failure: an early intervention to assist at-risk medical students. Medical Teacher. 36(1). 25-31.
- Haut commissariat au Plan. Femmes et Hommes en Chiffres 2016. www.hcp.ma
- Nuzhat, A., Salem, R. O., Hamdan, N. A., & Ashour, N. (2013). Gender differences in learning styles and academic performance of medical students in Saudi Arabia. Medical teacher, 35(sup1), S78-S82.
- Balkis, M., & Erdinç, D. U. R. U. (2017). Gender differences in the relationship between academic procrastination, satifaction with academic life and academic performance. Electronic Journal of Research in Educational Psychology, 15(1), 105-125.
- Blanch, D. C., Hall, J. A., Roter, D. L., & Frankel, R. M. (2008). Medical student gender and issues of confidence. Patient education and counseling, 72(3), 374-381.
- Frome, P. M., Alfeld, C. J., Eccles, J. S., & Barber, B. L. (2006). Why don't they want a male-dominated job? An investigation of young women who changed their occupational aspirations. Educational Research and Evaluation, 12(4), 359-372.
- Subramaniam, B. S., Hande, S., & Komattil, R. (2013). Attendance and achievement in medicine: Investigating the impact of attendance policies on academic performance of medical students. Annals of medical and health sciences research, 3(2), 202.
- Cohall, D. H., & Skeete, D. (2012). The impact of an attendance policy on the academic performance of first year medical students taking the Fundamentals of Disease and Treatment course. The Caribbean Teaching Scholar, 2(2).
- Zazulia, A. R., & Goldhoff, P. (2014). Faculty and medical student attitudes about preclinical classroom attendance. Teaching and learning in medicine, 26(4), 327-334.
- Eisen, D. B., Schupp, C. W., Isseroff, R. R., Ibrahimi, O. A., Ledo, L., & Armstrong, A. W. (2015). Does class attendance matter? Results from a second?year medical school dermatology cohort study. International journal of dermatology, 54(7), 807-816.
- Kang, S. H. (2016). Spaced repetition promotes efficient and effective learning: Policy implications for instruction. Policy Insights from the Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 3(1), 12-19.
- Branwen, G. (2009). Spaced Repetition for Efficient Learning.
- Baddeley, A. (2001). The concept of episodic memory. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences, 356(1413), 1345-1350.
- Clarke, D., & Hollingsworth, H. (2002). Elaborating a model of teacher professional growth. Teaching and teacher education, 18(8), 947-967
Wallace, J. (1992). Do Students Who Prefer To Learn Alone Achieve Better Than