1- Kamkhedkar SG, Malgaonkar AA, Kartikeyan S. Three - Dimensional embryology models as teaching aids for first-year medical students. International Journal of Biomedical Research ISSN: 2017; 8(04): 177-181. doi: https://dx.doi.org/10.7439/ijbr
2- Scott KM, Charles AR, Holland AJA. Clinical embryology teaching: is it relevant anymore? ANZ J Surg. 2013; 83:709-12. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ans.12213.
3- Holtfreter J. Address in honor of Viktor Hamburger. In: Locke M., editor. The Emergence of Order in Developing Systems; The Twenty-Seventh Symposium of the Society for Developmental Biology; New York: Academic Press; 1968. pp. ix–xx.
4- William B W. Teaching Concepts versus Facts in Developmental Biology. CBE life sciences education. 2008; 7: 10–16. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1187/cbe.07-12-0106.
5- Bernadette SB et al. Towards a 3-dimensional atlas of the developing human embryo. The Amsterdam experience Reproductive Toxicology. 2012; 34: 225–236. doi http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.reprotox.2012.05.087.
6- Schoenwolf, G. Atlas of Descriptive Embryology, 2007; 7th ed., SanFrancisco,
7- Jeff H. The Missing Dimension in Developmental Biology Education. CBE-Life Sciences Education. 2008; Vol. 7, No. 1: 1-162. doi: https://doi.org/10.1187/lse.7.1.cbe13.
8- Freitas LAM et al. Construction of embryonic models with recycled material for didactic using. Bioscience Journal. 2008; 24(1): 91-97.
9- Aziz MA et al. The human cadaver in the age of biomedical informatics. Anat Rec. 2002; 269: 20-32. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/ar.10046.
10- Koscinski I et al. Videos for embryology teaching, power and weakness of an innovative tool. Morphologie 2019;103: 72-79. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.morpho.2019.04.001.
11- Mathewson J. H. Visual-spatial thinking: an aspect of science overlooked by educators. Sci. Educ. 1999; 83: 33–54. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-237X(199901)83:1<33::AID-SCE2>3.0.CO;2-Z.
12- Lazar B et al. Hybrid 3D pregnant woman and fetus modeling from medical imaging for dosimetry studies. Int J CARS. 2009 Online. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11548-009-0381-3.
13- Azkue J.J. A digital tool for three-dimensional visualization and annotation in Anatomy and Embryology learning. European Journal of Anatomy, 2013; 17: 146-154.
14- Hardin J. Confocal and multi-photon imaging of living embryos. In: Handbook of Biological Confocal Microscopy, 3rd ed. 2006. J. Pawley, New York: Springer, 746–768.
15- Shepard RN, Metzler J. Mental rotation of three-dimensional objects. Science 1970; 171: 701–703. doi: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.171.3972.701.
16- Ekstrom RB et al. Manual from Kit of Factor-Referenced Cognitive Tests. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service. 1976; p173.
17- Kali Y, Orion N. Spatial abilities of high-school students in the perception of geologic structures. J. Res. Sci. Teach. 1996; 33: 369–391. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-2736(199604)33:4<369::AID-TEA2>3.0.CO;2-Q.
18- Leandro G G et al. EMBRIO v2.0-A Virtual Learning Environment for Embryology Teaching. International Journal of Information and Education Technology. 2017; 7(4): 297-300. doi: https://doi.org/10.18178/ijiet.2017.7.4.884.
19- Kakusho K et al. Illustrating human development by computer graphics for education in embryology. In Proc. The International Conference on Computers in Education. 2001; pp. 412-415.
20- Nguyen N et al. Visuospatial anatomy comprehension: the role of spatial visualization ability and problem-solving strategies. Anat Sci Educ. 2014; 7(4): 280-288. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/ase.1415.
21- Guillot A et al. Relationship between spatial abilities, mental rotation and functional anatomy learning. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract 2007; 12(4): 491-507. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-006-9021-7.
22- Nguyen N, Nelson AJ, Wilson TD. Computer visualizations: factors that influence spatial anatomy comprehension. Anat Sci Educ. 2012; 5(2):98-108. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/ase.1258.
23- Tworek JK et al. The LINDSAY Virtual Human Project: An immersive approach to anatomy and physiology. Anat Sci Educ. 2013; 6(1):19-28. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/ase.1301.
24- Khot Z et al. The relative effectiveness of computer-based and traditional resources for education in anatomy. Anat Sci Educ. 2013; 6(4): 211-215. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/ase.1355.
25- Abou HY et al. The application of 3D printing in anatomy education. Med Educ Online. 2015; 20: 29847. doi: https://doi.org/10.3402/meo.v20.29847.
26- Tit ML. Learning developmental biology has priority in the life sciences curriculum in Singapore. The International Journal of Developmental Biology. 2003; 47: 117-121.
27- Scott FG. All I Really Needed to Know I Learned during Gastrulation. CBE Life Sci Educ. 2008; 7(1):12-3. doi: https://doi.org/10.1187/lse.7.1.cbe12.